Table of Contents
We at Wowledge have generated significant interest in our posts and position papers on improving HR, building a more impactful HR team, the role of the CHRO, and, in particular, HR Business Partner (HRBP) priorities. In each of these, we discuss a primary objective of HR as strategically influencing and supporting the business and its key objectives. How that is accomplished is the question, with many avenues and methods. As the HRBP is a key role that identifies business challenges and objectives that can be positively influenced through talent programs, processes, and activities, optimizing that role is essential. What is most interesting, however, is the wide variation in duties and responsibilities that different writers and experts attribute to the HRBP role, no doubt contributing to a certain level of confusion and disagreement. What all those experts agree on, however, is the unique positioning of the role as a strategic partner to business leaders. And achieving that requires understanding the common pitfalls of the HRBP role.
Many experts also point to the most common pitfalls of the HRBP role and the extent to which position holders struggle to spend most of their time on truly strategic tasks and work. Ask any HRBP today, and the likelihood that they will complain about getting pulled into tactical or administrative work is extremely high, if not universal (an outcome of several of the common pitfalls of the HRBP role). Given the struggle that HR teams continue to face in being accepted as business partners, it should come as no surprise that they are still perceived as owners of “everything HR,” including small issues such as benefits enrollment challenges and employee relations issues. The classic issue for HR is balancing support for and delivery of more administrative or enterprise-wide processes and activities (annual merit pay, benefits enrollment, employee relations) with tailored, strategically focused solutions (organizational design, team building, high-potential (HiPo) assessment and development).
Some excellent insights have been generated by McKinsey, pointing to the need to change the name and laser-focus the efforts of the role. We agree while accepting the realities that face HR functions as they try to design and manage the role to maximize its strategic contributions. The core aspect of this is the design and execution of the role, understanding the common pitfalls of the HRBP, and how to free those critical strategic resources to best perform the strategic work they are being asked to do.
The HRBP role
Starting with an understanding of the role of the HRBP and how it differs from other HR roles, it becomes clear how HRBPs should spend their time. The role is designed to be a primary resource on people and talent strategies for an assigned part of the organization. As well as one can manage it, the HRBP acts as a communicator and distributor of business requirements to various HR Centers of Excellence (COE) and functions, thus enabling their requirements and issues to be blended with those of other parts of the organization to establish function-specific programming that addresses the needs of the broader organization. The specialized issues that require highly tailored and integrated responses are generally handled by the HRBP, which leads the effort, using resources from the COEs as needed to assess a situation, develop a response and action plan, and execute it to resolve the talent or business challenges.
Key contributions from HR Business Partners include:
Strategic Planning and Alignment
The HRBP is critical in ensuring that HR strategies and initiatives align seamlessly with business goals. This involves understanding the nuances of the business and its strategic direction and crafting HR interventions that support and drive these objectives. It uses that understanding of business objectives and plans to develop advanced project planning and to determine workforce size and capabilities. Another critical goal is to cultivate a leadership team and workforce equipped and motivated to fulfill the company's mission and vision over time, despite changing operational circumstances.
Talent Management and Development
HRBPs are instrumental in identifying talent gaps within their designated business units and orchestrating plans to bridge them. This includes collaborating with HR COE partners on succession planning, facilitating leadership development efforts, identifying opportunities and interventions to improve productivity and unit performance, and ensuring that employee segments have growth opportunities aligned with business needs.
Change Management
As businesses evolve, change is inevitable. HRBPs are often at the forefront of driving organizational change, ensuring that transitions, whether they involve mergers, acquisitions, or shifts in business strategy, are smooth and that employees are engaged and supported throughout the process. Helping the organization and its people prepare for and adapt to changing business circumstances and objectives, including building an agile and resilient business culture, is essential to the role.
Stakeholder Collaboration
A significant part of the HRBP's role is to build robust relationships with key stakeholders within their business units. They maintain a key HR coaching and consulting relationship with the business. As advisors, they recommend best practices, gather feedback, and ensure that HR's contributions are relevant and impactful to the business segment they support. As coaches, they provide feedback and guidance to leaders and managers as they work to direct their teams toward optimized performance and productivity.

The issue with the HRBP role versus the expectations of the HR function
So far, so good, right? The HRBP is ideally positioned as a strategic partner with business leaders. However, that partnership is conducted in the context of the purpose and primary contributions expected from the entire HR function. And, as the HRBP is considered the primary liaison to a part of the organization (location, division, function), it is easy to see how they can be asked to help solve non-strategic issues, representing common pitfalls of the HRBP role and responsibilities. A quick review of the key HR functions reveals some challenges to the HR Business Partner executing its role as designed.
- Talent Acquisition and Recruitment
- Learning and Development
- Performance Management
- Compensation and Benefits
- Employee and Labor Relations
- Workforce Planning and Strategy
- Career Management
- Compliance with Labor Laws
- Diversity and Inclusion
- HR Information Systems (HRIS) Management
- Employee Engagement and Culture
- Health and Safety
Reviewing this list, note the dominance of repeatable, high-volume processes impacting the entire workforce that include tasks of a highly administrative nature (recruiting, learning and development, performance management, compensation, and benefits) or those with heavy policy/compliance-based and data reporting tasks (employee relations, health and safety, diversity and inclusion, compliance with labor laws, HRIS). While some of these certainly require skilled, tailored responses at times to address specific business or talent challenges, they are generally made up of work that requires annual updates to their design and implementation. What is left, then, are Workforce Planning and Strategy, Employee Engagement, and Culture, which require continuous attention and management at the local, business-unit, and enterprise levels. It is those functions upon which an HRBP tends to focus their attention. Working on those strategic and complex issues can be a challenge when faced with the common pitfalls of the HRBP role.
The implications? Most HR activities touch all employees and are front and center in leaders' and managers’ minds. The challenge is that managers expect HR support for all of these and want answers and solutions to the issues that arise from them. Given the assignment of an HRBP to a business unit (and the desire and/or requirements to be viewed as a responsive problem solver), all HR issues that come to the HRBP can become priorities. As a result, the primary reason for the HRBP’s existence as a strategic, business-focused, and forward-viewing partner can become muddled in the day-to-day noise of employee and managerial concerns.

The factors (and solutions) that drive HRBPs into the trap of doing non-strategic work
Being pulled into non-strategic work is mostly due to a number of common pitfalls of the HRBP role. These roles are designed to be strategic liaisons between HR and the business, focusing on high-level planning and aligning HR services with business objectives. However, various challenges can sidetrack HR Business Partners from this strategic focus:
1. Operational demands
Often, HRBPs are pulled into day-to-day operational tasks, such as addressing individual employee issues, handling administrative tasks, or filling operational gaps within the HR department. These demands can consume significant time and energy, diverting attention from strategic initiatives.
Solution: Assign clear lines of authority (and escalation) for the core HR functions and processes. Conduct an audit of each key process, using methodologies and tools such as RACI (a responsibility assignment matrix) charts to clearly define who is responsible and can be called upon when issues arise. Publish those names/roles and contact information so the manager or HRBP can point the manager or employee to the person who can handle the issue. Develop responsiveness and closure metrics to track success rates and assign those as performance criteria for those job holders.
2. Lack of clear role definition
In some organizations, the role of an HR business partner is not clearly defined or understood. This ambiguity can lead to mismatches in expectations across other departments and within HR itself, with strategic roles diluted by operational tasks that should ideally be handled by other HR functions. Also, the HRBP is viewed as an escalation point given their assignment as the HR liaison to a particular part of the business.
Solution: Document and assign responsibilities for every HR process, practice, program, and system. Include and widely communicate escalation points for every function and broad exercise so that issues with regularly occurring employee lifecycle processes (e.g., annual enrollment, performance evaluations, employee complaints/charges, and so on) have clear escalation points for each level, from employees to VPs.
3. Insufficient resources
Limited resources, including staffing, technology, and budget constraints, can force HR business partners to take on non-strategic tasks simply because there's no one else to handle these responsibilities. This is especially true in smaller organizations or in times of cost-cutting.
Solution: Limit the number of HRBPs, with more HR staffers assigned to specialists (in COEs or HR Shared Services) and generalist roles (HR Managers). Staff generalist or specialist roles, either in the business units or part of HR Shared Services teams, and assign them responsibility for handling employee and manager inquiries, employee relations cases, managing annual processes (performance evaluations, benefits enrollment), etc.
4. Skillset misalignment
HR business partners may find themselves doing non-strategic work if there is a mismatch between their skill set and the strategic demands of their role. They may default to more familiar operational tasks without adequate training or experience in strategic HR practices.
Solution: Carefully assess, identify, and grow HRBPs. Create a career ladder in HR that develops current and future HRBPs’ skills in organization development (OD), performance consulting, Six Sigma/Lean, financial management, business operational expertise, HR analytics, reporting/storytelling, and so on. Consider hiring operational experts outside HR by using assessment strategies to identify potential HRBPs from business, engineering, technology, sales, marketing, and other areas. for those with overlapping skills and interpersonal capabilities to perform the job.
5. Lack of support from leadership
HR business partners may struggle to assert their strategic role without strong support from senior leadership. Leadership's failure to recognize the strategic value of HR can result in HR business partners being overloaded with operational duties.
Solution: Communicate the role and expectations of the HRBP with all leaders, and intervene when necessary to support the individual's tasking and work efforts. Engage the top leadership team in supporting and championing the role with frequent check-ins and discussions regarding each HRBP's efforts on the business unit's behalf.
6. Lack of HR strategic planning
A lack of strategic planning and focus within the HR function can leave HR business partners caught up in non-strategic work. Without a clear strategic plan that outlines the role and focus of HR business partners, they may default to addressing immediate operational needs. This is compounded if the HR department is seen primarily as an administrative or support function rather than a strategic partner.
Solution: Establish formal HR strategies at enterprise and business unit/function/location levels with strong linkages between HR plans and business objectives/challenges. Engage leaders at each level to review and/or co-develop the HR plans to support their business. Ensure that the performance metrics align HR efforts with the business and associated talent issues the HRBP will address.
7. Cultural factors
Organizational culture plays a significant role. In cultures that do not value HR as a strategic partner, HR business partners are more likely to be pulled into non-strategic work. Overcoming this requires changing the perception of HR's role within the organization, which is a significant challenge.
Solution: In addition to limiting the number of HRBPs to ensure enough resources are allocated to other HR functions, strategic planning, frequent reporting on business and related talent issues and market trends, and how HR will address those go a long way toward building credibility. Creating and publishing HR metrics and data attuned to managers’ and leaders’ questions creates a similar effect.
8. Lack of business breadth and depth
HR professionals traditionally come from non-business or technical educational and experiential backgrounds. Social sciences, liberal arts, and related degree programs continue to dominate the backgrounds of HR team members. This results from the job requirements emphasizing interpersonal skills, communications, process/procedure design and management, adult learning, legal compliance, etc. A continuing lack of data and statistical expertise in HR is a clear indicator of the underdevelopment of quantitative skills typically found in business, scientific, and technology fields.
Solution: Traditional HR professionals are not known as business experts, and, as a result, that perception undermines the credibility of their entire function. It is critical that HRBPs develop and continuously maintain their knowledge and expertise in how the business is run, its primary and competitively differentiating capabilities, and how the company generates revenue and profit. They can develop expertise in the elements of a modern, impactful HR strategic plan, including external factors such as macroeconomic and industry trends, internal barriers such as automation or production facility shortcomings, and sales struggles in region “A,” among others.
9. Not being able to say “No”
The most trusted and credible partners are those tasked with solving intractable problems across the spectrum of HR services. The issue is that they deliver consistently and at a high level and, as a result, are often asked to resolve seemingly petty issues. This may appear overly basic, but it occurs with great regularity.
Solution: Clarify role responsibilities and use the coaching and performance management processes to keep HRBPs from performing these tasks “as a favor” to their assigned clients. While this can appear easy, supporting the HRBPs who do so and receiving resistance are key to developing a stronger “backbone.”
Overcoming these challenges requires clear role definition, adequate resources, ongoing development of strategic HR skills, strong leadership support, effective HR structure, and a culture that values HR's strategic contribution. It calls out the need to assess and address the common pitfalls of the HRBP role and the extent to which they compromise or limit the effectiveness of those professionals.
Relevant Practices & Tools
Core HR Strategy Practices to Define a Foundational Direction for the HR Function. >
An HR Strategy defines the process of identifying business-based human resource (HR) tactics that will constitute a comprehensive multi-year approach to managing the HR function... more »
HR Business Partner Success Profile: Deep Dive. >
An HR Business Partner (HRBP) is a strategic role within the Human Resources function, closely collaborating with business leaders to align HR strategies with business objectives... more »
HR Manager, HR Generalist, and HR Business Partner Role Differences: Deep Dive. >
While on the surface, the roles of HR Managers, HR Generalists, and HR Business Partners (HRBPs) might appear to overlap, each position possesses a unique set of skills and expertise... more »
Establishing a Core Talent Management Strategy to Set Priorities and a Strategic Roadmap. >
As a company defines its business strategy, each function must align its objectives and actions to support its strategic goals. Talent management strategy is a key process that the HR function... more »
The External Environmental Scan Tool: Capture and Categorize Factors Outside of the Company’s Scope Impacting its Objectives. >
This template provides a structure for identifying key external topics that should be considered in a formal analysis of the business’s upcoming challenges... more »
FAQs
How can an HR operating model be structured to prevent HRBPs from absorbing transactional work?
An effective model separates “run” from “change.” HR shared services handle high-volume inquiries and cases with defined service-level agreements (SLAs), while functional HR specialists or centers of excellence (COEs) own design and standards, and HRBPs focus on business-facing advisory and orchestration activities. A single intake channel, triage rules, and clear escalation tiers stop work from defaulting to the HRBP. Success is reinforced by case-management tools and metrics visible to executives.
How should HRBPs decline non-strategic requests without damaging relationships?
A consistent script anchors on value and pathway, not refusal. The HRBP acknowledges the business need, identifies the appropriate channel or owner and service expectations, and offers to monitor outcomes if the issue affects a strategic priority. When patterns emerge, the HRBP proposes a systemic fix rather than repeatedly absorbing the work. Professional follow-through maintains trust.
What capabilities differentiate truly strategic HRBPs?
Beyond core, cross-functional HR knowledge and expertise, high-impact HRBPs demonstrate commercial acumen, organization development (OD) and change expertise, data analysis and storytelling, and basic financial modeling. Deep familiarity with operations, supply chain, product, or sales contexts increases credibility. Development plans should include cross-functional rotations, consulting toolkits, and sponsor-led exposure to annual planning cycles. Frequent practice with business cases sharpens the edge.
How should HRBPs partner with COEs to avoid duplicated effort?
This is the most common issue in HR operating models. Joint planning at the start of the year aligns enterprise and business unit priorities with COE roadmaps and defines who leads what. HRBPs surface field insights and quantify business impact; COEs bring design standards and scalable solutions; both agree on pilots, measures, and rollout criteria. A shared backlog and a designated “single owner” per initiative prevent rework. Post-implementation reviews capture learnings for reuse.
